by Katie Daniel | June 1, 2016 11:49 am
by Dean Lewis
Fenestration—such as windows, curtain walls, window walls, sloped glazing, storefronts, and doors—affects building energy use through four basic mechanisms: thermal heat transfer, solar heat gain, visible transmittance, and air leakage. Product designers, architects, and specifiers must reconcile the interplay of these factors to arrive at, or verify, optimal thermal performance.
Commercial fenestration manufacturers must devise one-of-a-kind custom configurations for each project. Each job-specific configuration would have to undergo a ‘one-time’ testing and certification process under the National Fenestration Rating Council’s (NFRC) Component Modeling Approach (CMA) or other development and analysis protocols. Making separate calculations for the performance of every glazing configuration would be time- and cost-prohibitive. However, because the essential parameters vary linearly with respect to one another, there is an opportunity to simplify the process.
American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s (AAMA) 507-15, Standard Practice for Determining the Thermal Performance Characteristics of Fenestration Systems Installed in Commercial Buildings, provides manufacturers, architects, builders, and code authorities with a means to verify the energy performance of glazed fenestration systems used in commercial buildings. (To obtain a copy of AAMA 507-15, visit www.aamanet.org/store[1]). The following thermal performance characteristics are included:
Each of these metrics is provided for both a specific fenestration systems and a specific overall building. (For more, see “Thermal Performance Characteristics.”)
The method can be useful in the determining of overall building performance, occupant comfort, and HVAC sizing, and is relevant to:
It defers to AAMA 1503, Voluntary Test Method for Thermal Transmittance and Condensation Resistance of Windows, Doors, and Glazed Wall Sections, or NFRC 100, Procedure for Determining Fenestration Product U-factors, for low-rise residential structures.
Establishing system-specific thermal performance
Section 6.0 of AAMA 507-15 provides a method to help determine U-factors, SHGC, VT, and CRF of specific fenestration systems.
Vision area U-factor
The methodology begins by sending a representative sample of a specific framing system and configuration (i.e. product line) to an NFRC-approved laboratory to be tested for U-factor in accordance with NFRC 102, Procedure for Measuring the Steady-state Thermal Transmittance of Fenestration Systems. A simulation of the operator type, frame type, and basic profiles are also run per NFRC 100.
If the simulation and test results are determined to be equivalent, a graph is constructed by the laboratory giving the thermal performance for this specific framing with variations in glazing type (different combinations of low-emissivity [low-e] coatings and/or gas fills) and size throughout the U-factor range noted above.
For a given framing system and center-of-glass (COG) configuration, the relationship between U-factor and percent of vision area is linear.
Therefore, it is only necessary to determine the U-factor for each glazing at two percentages of vision area. Using NFRC-approved simulation tools, the system U-factor is determined at 70 and 95 percent vision area, utilizing the same glass aspect ratios as in the test unit. Once these two points have been established, the straight line is calculated. If the product vision area falls outside these bounds, vision area ratios shall be expanded or shifted to account for the appropriate frame/glass ratio.
A matrix of NFRC-recognized sizes can allow extrapolation beyond NFRC fixed sizes. This is an especially good tool for sizing comfort heating and cooling systems. The matrix can be created using the same COG increments to obtain various system U-factors.
This matrix is generated by an NFRC-accredited simulation laboratory, or by an NFRC independent approved calculation entity utilizing approved frame, glass, and spacer components within the NFRC Component Modeling Approach Software Tool (CMAST) program. The matrix can be used to prepare a ‘fenestration product rating certificate’ for a specific project—an example is shown in Figure 1.
Spandrel area U-factor
Spandrel areas, defined as those parts of an opaque wall between the heads of windows and the sills of the windows above them, are handled in essentially the same manner as vision areas. A graph is constructed giving the thermal performance for this specific framing system with variations in the spandrel insulation and in the percentage of spandrel. This is accomplished by simulating the edge and center of the spandrel with insulation.
It is assumed the spandrel insulation does not cover the framing members, is flush with the 6-mm (0.25-in) glass, and has a foil facing exposed to the interior. At a minimum, the spandrel insulation shall be based on the R-values and thicknesses (in parentheses) in Figure 2.
Solar heat gain coefficient
A system-specific SHGC is developed in much the same manner as the U-factor, but determined in accordance with NFRC 200, Procedure for Determining Fenestration Product Solar Heat Gain Coefficient and Visible Transmittance at Normal Incidence.
For a given glass type, the relationship between SHGC and percent of vision area is linear. A graph is constructed utilizing COG SHGC determined in accordance with NFRC 200 and ranging from 0.05 to 0.75 in 0.05 increments. The SHGC for each glazing option is determined at 70 and 95 percent vision area utilizing the same infill aspect ratio as in the test unit.
Visual transmittance
System-specific VT values can be developed using the same approach as for determining SHGC, again, in accordance with NFRC 200.
Building-specific thermal performance
An estimate of the overall U-factors for a specific building is determined by the area-weighted U-factor from each component. This is accomplished for the vision area, spandrel area, and/or combined vision/spandrel area by depicting actual U-factors in a chart format developed from the following generalized area-weighted equation.
UO= (UCOGACOG + UEOGAEOG + UFAF)/APF
Where:
UO = U-factor (overall);
UCOG = U-factor (center-of-glass);
ACOG = Area (center-of-glass);
UEOG = U-factor (edge-of-glass);
AEOG = Area (edge-of-glass);
UF = U-factor (frame);
AF = Area (frame); and
APF = Total area (area of the rough opening in the building envelope for the fenestration product, less installation clearances).
Vision area
To determine the U-factor for the vision area of a specific building, it is first necessary to know the COG U-factor and the percent of vision area to total area. One enters the chart on the horizontal axis at the appropriate percentage of vision area to total area, and projects a line vertically until it intersects with the COG U-factor line for the building. Then, a line is projected horizontally until it intersects with the vertical axis. This intersection indicates the system U-factor for the vision area. Since the relationships are linear, interpolation or extrapolation is permitted within the chart. COG U-factor typically is given in the glass manufacturer’s data as wintertime (night) U-factor.
Spandrel area
To determine the U-factor for the spandrel area of a specific building, it is first necessary to know the R-value of the spandrel insulation and the percent of spandrel area to total area. The system U-factor is determined in the same manner as that for the vision area.
Combined vision and spandrel
For fenestration systems that have a combination of vision and spandrel areas in a single elevation, such as in a curtain wall, the vision and spandrel portions must be separately determined. If a single U-factor is required for an elevation that contains both vision and spandrel, it shall be determined by area weighting the respective U-factors to the total area of the entire assembly (Figure 3). The SHGC and VT for a specific building are developed similarly based on COG values.
Representative values for generic products
While product- and project-specific U-factors will vary and are determined in accordance with the method just described, framing systems in commercial building applications typically consist of aluminum structural members that can be categorized generically as non-thermal, thermally improved, containing a thermal barrier, structurally glazed, or a combination thereof. These are defined as follows:
The generic thermal transmittances of the four framing systems are pre-calculated as shown in Figure 4. These pre-calculated U-factors are conservative and may be used as an estimating tool in the early phases of design. AAMA 507 shows graphs for all these systems.
AAMA 507 uses the same test and computer simulation tools required by NFRC and results in similar values for U-factor and SHGC. The main difference is the AAMA procedure combines frame and glass ratings to provide an overall system rating without requiring additional project-specific simulations and laboratory fees. It can also be used to calculate the performance of actual products with real vision and spandrel area, rather than that of a hypothetical model size as in the NFRC procedure—an approach that produces less-accurate estimates of actual demands and HVAC-sizing the more the real product varies from the model size.
As the Aluminum Extruders Council (AEC) has observed: “AAMA 507 is a simple, usable and enforceable option for rating commercial windows, and is well-suited to the process used to construct commercial fenestration.”
THERMAL PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS |
American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s (AAMA) 507-15, Standard Practice for Determining the Thermal Performance Characteristics of Fenestration Systems Installed in Commercial Buildings, provides a means to verify the energy performance of glazed fenestration assemblies. It offers a method in order to determine certain thermal performance characteristics of specific systems.
Thermal transmittance Solar heat gain coefficient Visible transmittance Air leakage resistance Condensation resistance factor |
Dean Lewis is the American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s (AAMA’s) technical manager of training and education, employing his technical experience to manage and advance the group’s product and professional certification programs. He began his career in the fenestration industry at PPG Industries with positions in project engineering and design, and has served on committees of ASTM, American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). Lewis has also served on the standards and certification committees of a dozen national and international organizations. He can be reached at dlewis@aamanet.org[2].
Source URL: https://www.constructionspecifier.com/designing-better-commercial-fenestration-through-thermal-design/
Copyright ©2025 Construction Specifier unless otherwise noted.